[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /viewtopic.php on line 1052: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/New_York' for 'EDT/-4.0/DST' instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /viewtopic.php on line 1052: getdate() [function.getdate]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/New_York' for 'EDT/-4.0/DST' instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/functions.php on line 4505: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /includes/functions.php:3706)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/functions.php on line 4507: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /includes/functions.php:3706)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/functions.php on line 4508: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /includes/functions.php:3706)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/functions.php on line 4509: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /includes/functions.php:3706)
mightyram50.net • View topic - Manual Trans compatibility question

Manual Trans compatibility question

Transmission Rebuilds or problems? Ask it here.

Manual Trans compatibility question

Postby Chauron » Mon Sep 28, 2009 8:31 pm

I'm sure this has been talked about already but is the manual transmission from a 90 2.4L the same as the manual from an 88 2.0L? If not, are they interchangeable?
User avatar
Chauron
Member
Member
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 3:37 pm
Engine Size: 2.4L
What year vehicle do you own?: 1990

Re: Manual Trans compatibility question

Postby Johnboy72 » Tue Sep 29, 2009 4:08 am

No, the 2.4, 2.6 and believe 2.0 (auto) are all wide blocks. The 2.0 5spd are narrowblock. Believe if you measure the two bottom bellhousing bolt holes that will tell ya the answer. Someone correct me if I'm wrong but the narrow block is 12.25" and wide block is 13.25". If no one answers, I have both transmissions and can measure after work. I can measure both blocks too.
User avatar
Johnboy72
VIP
VIP
 
Posts: 393
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 8:36 pm
Location: Ft. Stewart, GA

Re: Manual Trans compatibility question

Postby Chauron » Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:17 pm

Ah ok, I'll take a look at mine and get measurements.
User avatar
Chauron
Member
Member
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 3:37 pm
Engine Size: 2.4L
What year vehicle do you own?: 1990

Re: Manual Trans compatibility question

Postby Spicoli » Tue Sep 29, 2009 4:19 pm

Johnboys right.
--keRby

LethalEthan wrote: I wish I had 10 exhaust pipes, I bet that shit flows like LL Cool J


Ad Inexplorata
User avatar
Spicoli
VIP
VIP
 
Posts: 383
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 8:21 am
Location: KS

Re: Manual Trans compatibility question

Postby pennyman1 » Tue Sep 29, 2009 5:41 pm

But all manual trannys are wide block, so a manual 2.4 should fit a manual 2.0. the clutch disc and pressure plate may be different though
Pennyman1
Living the D-50 life since 1980
The best Dodge that Dodge never made
User avatar
pennyman1
VIP
VIP
 
Posts: 541
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:30 am
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Re: Manual Trans compatibility question

Postby DroppedMitsu » Tue Sep 29, 2009 7:09 pm

No pennyman a 2.0L with a manual 5 speed tranny is NARROW block.

To the original poster, no they are no the same and will not interchange because the 2.4 is a wideblock and the 2.0 manual tranny is narrowblock as Johnboy stated
-Josh-
1987 Mighty Max with 4g63 Turbo swap
1989 Macrocab Mighty Max
DroppedMitsu
VIP
VIP
 
Posts: 194
Joined: Sat May 09, 2009 11:34 am
Location: Vacaville, CA (Nor-Cal)
Engine Size: 4g63
What year vehicle do you own?: 1987

Re: Manual Trans compatibility question

Postby TotallyBalistic » Tue Sep 29, 2009 7:17 pm

what are you needing a trans for?
Chuck Norris doesnt read books, he stares them down until he gets the information he wants.
595 
User avatar
TotallyBalistic
Good Times
Good Times
 
Posts: 259
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Grand Saline, Tx.
Engine Size: 2.0
What year vehicle do you own?: 1988

Re: Manual Trans compatibility question

Postby Chauron » Wed Sep 30, 2009 1:34 pm

I recently pulled an 88 Max out of a field for $350, the guy said it was really hard getting it from 1st to 2nd and that it would grind doing it.... I'm thinking its a synchro issue but I'm not sure, nor have I had the chance to experience the problem myself. We just got it running Tuesday but it needs an idler arm before I'm gonna attempt to drive it.

There's a junkyard around here that I've heard will sell any transmission for $90 with a 30 day garantee, if you pull it yourself.
User avatar
Chauron
Member
Member
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 3:37 pm
Engine Size: 2.4L
What year vehicle do you own?: 1990

Re: Manual Trans compatibility question

Postby Johnboy72 » Wed Sep 30, 2009 2:39 pm

That's a good price. Cash N Carry in Savannah charged me like $125 core included and believe they have a 30 or 90 day warranty. www.iluvused.com
User avatar
Johnboy72
VIP
VIP
 
Posts: 393
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 8:36 pm
Location: Ft. Stewart, GA

Re: Manual Trans compatibility question

Postby pennyman1 » Wed Sep 30, 2009 5:54 pm

Even I can learn something- I may have known about the 2.0 5 speed being different, but I didn't know that its a narrow block as well.
Pennyman1
Living the D-50 life since 1980
The best Dodge that Dodge never made
User avatar
pennyman1
VIP
VIP
 
Posts: 541
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:30 am
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Next

Return to Transmission.


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron