[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /viewtopic.php on line 1052: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/New_York' for 'EDT/-4.0/DST' instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /viewtopic.php on line 1052: getdate() [function.getdate]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/New_York' for 'EDT/-4.0/DST' instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/functions.php on line 4505: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /includes/functions.php:3706)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/functions.php on line 4507: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /includes/functions.php:3706)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/functions.php on line 4508: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /includes/functions.php:3706)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/functions.php on line 4509: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /includes/functions.php:3706)
mightyram50.net • View topic - this may be a stupid question but...
Page 1 of 1

this may be a stupid question but...

PostPosted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 2:03 pm
by PowerRam348
would i be able to achieve better top end using a camshaft for a 2.6 turbo lebaron in a non turbo 2.6? just wondering.

Re: this may be a stupid question but...

PostPosted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 10:13 pm
by capev86
umm.....turbo lebaron?

the lebarons that i am aware of were all chrysler products and most of the front wheel driver era ones had the dodge 2.2/2.5. no 2.6 turbo in a k car....they could be had with a 2.2 turbo, and then the J body 2 door lebaron of the 90's that sometimes got the 2.5 turbo if it didn't have a mitsu 3.0 v6 in it!

maybe the mitsu lancer got a 2.6 turbo?.......chrysler had a lancer back in the 80's based on the k car.

my research into the chrysler 2.2/2.5 turbo leads me to believe that you don't want to put a turbo cam in an n/a engine as you will lose power. you can use an n/a cam in a turbo engine with some tuning. i know nothing about the cam profiles and power band characteristics on the mitsubishi engines though.