[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /viewtopic.php on line 1052: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/New_York' for 'EDT/-4.0/DST' instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /viewtopic.php on line 1052: getdate() [function.getdate]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/New_York' for 'EDT/-4.0/DST' instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/functions.php on line 4505: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /includes/functions.php:3706)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/functions.php on line 4507: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /includes/functions.php:3706)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/functions.php on line 4508: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /includes/functions.php:3706)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /includes/functions.php on line 4509: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /includes/functions.php:3706)
mightyram50.net • View topic - 1991 2.4l question?

mightyram50.net

A site for Mitsubishi Mighty Max and Dodge Ram 50 Enthusiasts.
http://www.mightyram50.net/phpBB3/

1991 2.4l question?

http://www.mightyram50.net/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=102&t=1724

Page 1 of 2

1991 2.4l question?

PostPosted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 12:23 pm
by draginmightymax
can you switch the 2.4l motor from fuel injection to carberated?

Re: 1991 2.4l question?

PostPosted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 1:26 pm
by Josh2g
Just curious but why would you want to?

Re: 1991 2.4l question?

PostPosted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 11:08 pm
by draginmightymax
cause im wanting to take it to carb so i can keep it cleaner. (not as much wiring)

and cause its simple.

Re: 1991 2.4l question?

PostPosted: Sun Nov 07, 2010 7:42 am
by LSR Mike
Yes it can be done. If you can put a 350 Chevy in one too.

Re: 1991 2.4l question?

PostPosted: Sun Nov 07, 2010 7:52 pm
by draginmightymax
LSR Mike wrote:Yes it can be done. If you can put a 350 Chevy in one too.

so just put a 350 in it? what is the best tranny to go behind that?

Re: 1991 2.4l question?

PostPosted: Mon Nov 08, 2010 5:14 am
by Josh2g
draginmightymax wrote:
LSR Mike wrote:Yes it can be done. If you can put a 350 Chevy in one too.

so just put a 350 in it? what is the best tranny to go behind that?


Turbo 350 or if you want a manual the T56.

Re: 1991 2.4l question?

PostPosted: Tue Nov 09, 2010 9:45 pm
by draginmightymax
thanks man. im probably gonna go with the turbo 350.

Re: 1991 2.4l question?

PostPosted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 6:12 pm
by pennyman1
I got an intake for a 2.4 that is built for a 2bbl carb to really mess with your choices. Its new never used; bought it for my 86 2.0 but changed my mind on using it.

Re: 1991 2.4l question?

PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 9:15 pm
by draginmightymax
pennyman1 wrote:I got an intake for a 2.4 that is built for a 2bbl carb to really mess with your choices. Its new never used; bought it for my 86 2.0 but changed my mind on using it.


so the 2.0 and 2.4 intakes are interchangable?

Re: 1991 2.4l question?

PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 6:28 pm
by pennyman1
Not sure, I haven't looked to see yet.
All times are UTC - 8 hours
Page 1 of 2
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/